|
This site is about Quantum physics proving religious
beliefs about Creation to be right, and about the spirit, the soul, angels,
gods, fallen angels, demons and Aliens.
|
||||
|
This site is about Quantum physics proving religious
beliefs about Creation to be right, and about the spirit, the soul, angels,
gods, fallen angels, demons and Aliens.
|
||||
|
Last update Feb 4 2012 |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
The more physicists are probing the universe for its secrets, unraveling our material world to prove their established theories, the more they find that it just isn't what they thought it was. Our physical world just isn't as material as they used to think. As a matter of fact it isn't material at all and in spite of all theories about material particles making up this world it turns out that the world we live in and really, this whole universe we are part of, our flesh and bones, the sand, the fire, the water and the air we breathe are nothing else but intertwined energies that are responding to our wishes or expectations. That's what this world is made of. Everything is energy. Everything is spirit because spirit is just an old word for energy. It turns out that age-old religious beliefs, often misunderstood, misinterpreted and mistranslated and ridiculed as a consequence of it were right on the money about the world we live in and its origin. It is said that ours is a uniformly expanding universe, with galaxies moving away from each other like raisins in a rising loaf of raisin bread. The most logical shape for a uniformly expanding universe would have to be a sphere, because, if it wasn't a spherical shape, it wouldn't be a uniformly expanding Universe. Right? A spherical shape would be plausible because the "flat" spiral Galaxies also have an Egg shaped area of Dark Matter; nonluminous nonreflecting clouds of dust and gas and what is called Dark Energy surrounding them. The reason this Dark energy is called dark is because we cannot see it with our human eyes or current equipment but it may in fact be a lot brighter than we can imagine.
The Universe at 379.000 years of age. The Universe looks like a flattened ball and does seem to have something of an egg shape, as in the "Egg of Brahma". Of course you wouldn't be able to look at it from the outside, because its light wouldn't have reached you yet; the picture would be black, but it is an egg shape all the same complete with yoke and shell. Also, space itself wouldn't have reached you yet. Although according to some theories, entire universe-bubbles may coexist next to ours, which at least suggests the possibility to be on the outside of this universe. The only thing that would keep us from going there is the speed limit. You wouldn't be able to get there, because, they've always taught us that it is impossible to exceed the speed of light. The fact aside that the outer stars are not moving away that fast, it now turns out that it is possible after all. Some scientists were already theorizing about faster than light particles they called Tachyons. Steven Hawking himself says that by the time the Cosmos was ten minutes old, it was already thousands of light years in diameter. And then of course there is the Hyper-inflation theory that claims that the universe itself expanded to the better part of its size in a trillionth of a trillionth of a second, which of course is way, and I mean WAY faster than the speed of light. "Yeah, but that was before time even existed and the laws of physics didn't apply". But that doesn't matter really, does it? One moment the universe doesn't exist and the next moment it's there, be it an expanding one. It is indeed as if some God in His heaven uttered a Word and as He spoke, it became Reality. At least that's how our ancestors would describe it.
Our Universe turns out to be an ideal place for life to evolve. For every constant factor of physics goes that the values may not differ to much (at all) since otherwise stars, planets and life it self would not have been able to evolve. If the Gravity constancy had been just a little lower, planets, stars and clusters would not have been formed because particles wouldn't have had time to cluster and would have faded into space. If the gravity constancy had been just a little higher, stars would have collapsed under their own weight into black holes and in either way, life would have been impossible. We were always taught that in the universe it is gravity, that keeps everything together. It is caused by matter; the planets, the stars and star-cluster and such, but it is known for over 80 years now that there aren't nearly enough stars and planets in this Cosmos to be accountable for this. Fritz Zwicky as far back as the thirties already knew that all the stars and planets put together in the Coma cluster he was studying, could never account for the gravitational pull they were supposed to deliver. And they still don't know what causes it. So either there has to be a lot of undetected matter between the stars, they would call "Dark Matter" or Newton and Einstein go right out the window. Their laws that is. But even if you add this Dark Matter you come up short 70%. Well what then? Dark Energy maybe? They're still in the dark about that. Fact is though that there has to be some other force or power accountable for regulating the expansion of the universe exactly enough for us to exist at all. Organic molecules are our main ingredient. Carbon atoms are formed inside the sun, but only when they have a certain level of energy that would be influential to the output of its fusion reactions (Fred Hoyle). Protons are 1831 times heavier than electrons. Nobody knows why, because there is no law to determine that, but if the mass ratio had been just a little different, no stable atoms would have been formed, or at least not in this diversity. No atoms; no molecules; no life, no nothing. No physical life anyway. So life is only possible in a universe in which the constant factors of physics have particular values. Ours is a very fine tuned universe indeed. Considering the necessity of the constant factors of physics to be exact for life to evolve, there seems only room for one universe. If there are other universes somewhere, they too will have to be just as perfect. The all including theory of physics behind it, explaining the values of the constants of physics would be the yet to produce "THEORY OF EVERYTHING". It has every appearance of it that this theory of everything is going to point at God as creator of the universe. Be it reluctantly and only if they're honest about it. Stars are like giant factories. The sun produces the energy we need to live and the very same process that causes the stars to shine also happens to make materials like oxygen, carbon and iron, vital building blocks for life as we know it. This of course has nothing to do with a lack of order; irregularity, imperfection and plain luck as it is often explained, but more with cause and effect. With all due respect, Mr. Hawking, but expressions like "a long and remarkable run of good luck", "chance" and "accidents" as a scientific explanation of our existence in this universe seem a bit thin for a scientist of your repute. Or maybe you too are just fishing in the dark. Without a lantern that is. That this universe may have started by accident doesn't mean that it did. "With all these atoms moving around in space, if you give it enough time it could happen just by chance it might". Or so they say. Even in this expanding universe? "If you wait long enough for all the oxygen molecules to be on the far side of the room it might just happen someday". Really? Would snooker billiard balls scattered across the table suddenly go back to the racked formation they had in the beginning after hitting them with the cue ball? Maybe if you shook the table long enough? It would need a pretty big fluctuation in time-space to allow the universe to happen by chance and it has been mathematically proven by Sir Arthur Eddington that the bigger the fluctuation has to be for something to happen by chance, the unlikelier it is that it's going to happen. Just like in the "oxygen" room, there might be a very small spot where there's no oxygen molecules for a brief moment, but the chance that all the oxygen molecules are going to be on the far side of the room just by accident is zero. Chance is not an option here. Although the terms "cause and effect" are typical scientific terms, scientists are reluctant to apply them to the origin of our universe because they point to a law, or (the horror) even a dominant willpower behind it all, which might indicate the existence of a God. So, to avoid God in all of this, the Multiverse, the Multi-universe was invented, in which ALL possibilities were available and ours, obviously, would be the one that won, the one we're in. "See, matter has positive energy and gravity has negative energy, so you can make a universe for nothing. Would cost you nothing. You could even make an infinite number of universes." Well I'd like to see you try. At CERN alone they've already spent over 10 Billion Dollars just to try and produce a single particle. If the universe started out with energies cancelling each other out, (which is like two locomotives pushing against each other), it didn't start out with nothing. It all started with energies. Who brought in those energies? And let's say you'd be able to make a universe. Wouldn't that mean that it had a creator? "But there was no pre-existing time. God must have existed before the Big Bang, but there was no -Before the Big Bang-." Well, maybe not in this universe, but if you suggest that one universe after another has been "popping into existence, you simply cannot rule out time, can you? Or space for that matter if you want them to bump in to each other. It would mean that there is time and space outside and apart from our universe. Even if there's only one universe. If you would indeed produce a universe, would that mean that there was no pre-existing time before it? Time outside our universe may be completely different from how we perceive time inside it. At least that's what people say who had Near Death experiences. Time inside our universe just started when God inflated this universe we're in, AS IF it were a balloon in his hand. Do not make the mistake of thinking that God is restricted to this universe, because you would be assuming that God came into existence along with our universe, which is an error. He already existed. God is infinite, our universe is not. How can it be? It started somewhere and is inflating. How can a balloon be infinite? Or a rising loaf of raisin bread? It's Unimaginably big. It's vastness is beyond comprehension. That's for sure but everything that has a beginning has an end. It begins in the middle and ends at the edge. Or the other way around, what ever pleases you. Unless of course, it has always been here. But then the whole Big Bang theory goes out the window. There may be other dimensions or heavens, about nine, ten or eleven or so, (nine above and fourteen below) but an infinite number of universes would mean that somewhere there's a universe, with a version of you that would be like superman or superwoman and the rest would be the same. There even would be a physical universe where a version of you had scrambled eggs for breakfast in stead of cereals and all the rest of that universe would be the same as ours, including our past and future. But what would be the point? Not to mention the unavoidable infinite number of dead universes; failed attempts to produce life. Why this gigantic waste of energy? Nature doesn't waste anything so why would the universe itself be any different?
The
very fact that we are here proves that there could have been no
other outcome. The values set to be exact, sooner point to a
design plan set in
motion by a Creator;
set in motion by God. According to the theory of the
Anthropic Principle
, the very fact that we are here, implies that
it was meant to be so.
Chaos; etymology;
"gaping void," from L.
chaos, from Gk.
khaos
"abyss, that which gapes wide open, is vast and empty," from
khnuos, from PIE base
*gheu-,
*gh(e)i- "to gape" (cf. Gk
khaino "I yawn,")
O.E. ginian, O.N.
ginnunga-gap. Meaning "utter confusion" is extended from theological use
of chaos for "the void at the beginning of
creation" in Vulgate version of Genesis. The Gk. for "disorder" was
tarakhe, however the use of
chaos here was rooted in Hesiod ("Theogony"),
who describes khaos as the primeval emptiness of
the Universe, begetter of Erebus ("Darkness") and Nyx ("Night"),
and in Ovid ("Metamorphoses"), who opposes
Khaos to Kosmos; "the ordered Universe."
www.etymonline.com/
Chaos isn't what we think it
is.
The word Chaos carries in it;
-vast open
emptiness- as well as -disorder-
(the Soup of Particles of the Big Bang Theory) which seems like a contradiction
in terms. The reason for this may be that the word was confused with the Hebrew
word "Kaos", which means "angry", in combination with the Biblical "Tohu
and Bohu"; formless and
empty, the state that the primordial world was in.
And the world
(eretz = earth, ground and world) was
formless and empty; and
darkness was upon the face of the deep. Ge.1:2
In mathematics, chaos theory describes the behavior of certain
dynamical systems – that is, systems whose states evolve with time –
that may exhibit dynamics that are highly sensitive to initial
conditions (popularly referred to as the
butterfly effect).
As a result of this sensitivity, which manifests itself as an
exponential growth of perturbations in the initial conditions, the
behavior of chaotic systems appears to be random.
This happens even though these systems are deterministic, meaning that
their future dynamics are fully defined by their initial conditions,
with no random elements involved. This behavior is known as
deterministic chaos, or simply chaos. ...Systems
that exhibit mathematical chaos are deterministic and thus orderly in
some sense; this
technical use of the word chaos is at odds with common
parlance, which suggests complete disorder. (Wikipedia)
What it actually says here is that
every effect has its cause and every effect works itself out in an orderly
fashion that only
seems
to be chaotic in the eyes of the beholder, but has a clearly defined structure.
Back in the sixties Edward
Lorenz already knew that though the initial state of events may seem unrelated
and random, eventually a pattern emerges and in the end all the peaces fit
together. Some phenomena only appear random but have in fact an element of
regularity that can be described mathematically.
Even in what we call Chaos; the
primordial world, the present world already was detectable for whoever would have had an
eye for it. There was no disorder. The world just
hadn't manifested itself yet.
All
manifestations come out of the unmanifest state of Prakriti at the
arrival of Brahma's day, and they again merge into
the same
(unmanifest) Prakriti at the coming of Brahma's night.
Bhagavad-Gita 8.18
Some try to apply the
second
law of thermodynamics on the universe; entropy
(disorder) tends to increase (or stays the same) in a closed system.
You go from low entropy to high entropy; our universe is either supposed to stay
in the same orderly state or get more and more disordered.
Sean Carroll, theoretical
physicist on
www.ted.com/ argues that
things naturally become messier. You go from orderly, low entropy to disorderly,
high entropy, the other one never happens. So there wasn't chaos at all in the
beginning. Right in the beginning there was a lot of stuff concentrated in a
very delicate arrangement in a very low entropy. Right now he says there is a
high entropy and he does this while moons evolve around
planets evolving around suns evolving around central cores of the galaxies evolving around the central
"sun" of the universe, all pointing at a very low
entropy indeed. Not to mention the self containing system of life that evolved
here on Earth. Even if there's order (humans aside) here on earth, he says, in the big picture
it's all chaos and it's all going back to the low entropy
that there was in the beginning; when our universe falls apart in a very smooth
flare of atoms (a heat death). So first there was order, then there is the chaos we're in and
after this everything will be order again. Man if that's not turning things
upside down, I don't know what is. It completely disagrees with the second law
of thermodynamics which states that things will get messier over time. The
second law of thermodynamics could only apply to the universe if during and
after the Big Bang it was in a state of highest order that is gradually dissolving into
a somewhat lesser order and eventually falls apart in complete disorder. That
would make sense. The chaos would be the rubble that
remains in the end. Scientists often wonder;
Why did the universe have such a
low
entropy when it started?
Such high order. Why indeed.
What do you think.
Every effect has its cause; the
"flapping wings of a
butterfly
in Brazil may eventually cause a tornado in Texas", goes the theory. A small
change in the initial condition of the system may cause a chain of events
leading to large-scale phenomena. Had the butterfly not flapped its wings, the
trajectory of the system might have been vastly different.
OK !?!
Soup of Particles?
Imagine the effect of a Big Bang,
in which, according to these theories, the entire universe was already
predetermined, ...
us included, and
Tell me again you don't believe in God.
* ..
So, all matter has its origin in what we call the Big Bang. Matter, or; 'Earth, dust and flesh", to use some Biblical terms for it, is an arrangement of molecules. Molecules are made up of atoms that "look a bit like" miniature solar systems. A while back the common persuasion among scientists was that at least the core was solid matter; because there had to be matter to make up this material world. But it turns out to be a whole lot a nothing. At least 99.99999% of the atom is nothing; empty space (!!!). Atoms consist of a core, a nucleus of Protons and Neutrons that's wrapped in electrons with a space between them comparable to the distance between the sun and the earth, all in proportion of course and all the components keep "popping in and out of existence". Neutrons and Protons (called Nucleons) form the core, the Nucleus of the Atom, and consist of red, green and blue “up” and “down” Quarks that have no size at all. So the atom which is said to contain 99.99999% empty space consists of particles made of quarks that don't have any size at all. After doing the math on that, I think it's safe to say that an atom is a full 100% empty space; Molecules, atoms, Particles, stabile or not aren't little balls of matter but consist of nothing but energy. And I'm not the only one who thinks that. I tell you; THERE EXISTS NO MATTER IN ITSELF. All Matter originates and exists only because of a force, that induces atom-particles to vibrate, and holds them together in the most tiny solar system of the Atom. Max Planck Electrons belong to the lepton class particles that include the electron, muon, tau and their antiparticles, and the neutrino and antineutrino associated with each of these particles. These “particles” actually are (behave like) waves or fields of energy; these wavelike properties of electrons are utilized in the electron microscope and other devices. Neutrons will last about seventeen minutes in free state before they fade out, Protons will last a lot longer, about a thousand years they say, (though no one has ever timed it), but they still consist of the same Quarks that are (behave like) fields or waves of energy. (Wave/Particle Duality) As long as you don't look at them, that is. That's the weird part of it. If you don't look at them they are waves, but if you do look at them; if you focus your attention on them, they suddenly materialize into the particles you expect them to be. If a researcher expects a Quark to have topspin, it does. If he expects it to act like a wave, it does just that. The researcher, by focussing his attention to them, is manifesting them into reality. They seem to act accordingly to the will or "believe" of the observer, which sounds like a lot like magic. But then again, sometimes they don't. Sometimes they seem to have a mind of their own. Sometimes particles appear and disappear at will. Sometimes they exist at two places at the same time (Superposition). Is it any wonder that they come up with names like “up”, “down”, “truth”, “beauty”, “charm” and “strange” for these Quarks, that appear to be the very fabric of dreams and thoughts. Many more “particles” were named, and more and more were invented, such as the "Virtual Particles" that are used to explain static force fields, such as a simple electric or magnetic fields. The electromagnetic force, for instance, is mediated by the photon, the basic quantum of electromagnetic radiation. The strong force is mediated by the gluon, the weak force by the W and Z particles, and gravity is thought to be mediated by the graviton, which is a completely hypothetical particle all together. As if this weren't enough, it is thought that all particles, Photons, Electrons and Gravitons have counterparts named Sparticles (super symmetric particles). Because they desperately hold on to the Newtonian idea that the world is a material place, they keep on thinking in particles, describing to them properties like Superposition, Wave/Particle Duality, Entanglement, (when one particle reacts on what's happening with its counterpart no matter the distance) and Bose-Einstein Condensates (when different particles seem to be unified into one state, governed by one wave function). And while trying to squeeze all this into the frame of a material universe, they keep inventing more and more particles and then some. A particle for each different property they run into.
Since it is our consciousness that is manifesting particles into reality, dear Quantum physicians, have you ever considered the possibility that if you're looking for new particles, you might be manifesting them yourselves? Still, in the end, it all comes down to this; There are no material particles. It is all Energy; it is all "Light"; it is all Spirit. It's all Thought.
Matter is an illusion. It is like the Buddha said; Everything is Maya.
"Science" of course is aware of this, but can and will not accept this as long as it hasn't been proven under repeatable laboratory circumstances. (Which is hard to do if two different observers are influencing particles in two different ways.) It in particular seems hard to digest for most scientists that this knowledge already existed for thousands of years. Most scientists rather like to think and present it in such a manner, that they have discovered something new.
There is progress though because the latest thing is that there are no particles anymore but little rays or snares of energy and magical "M branes" making up our universe. So they are getting there. * Someone once compared matter with a library. The library contains books on shelves, the books contain chapters and paragraphs that are made up out of sentences that are made up out of words and the words are made up out of letters. So, he said, the letters form the words and the words form the sentences and the sentences form the paragraphs and chapters and they all form the books of the library. As if it all started with letters. He forgot to ask WHY. Why are there words in a book? Certainly not because the letters formed words by chance, accidents or a long and remarkable run of good luck. My guess would be that someone wanted to realize an idea. First he formed an idea in his mind or a story, then he put it in words and the idea crystallized in a book in the library.
Einstein, crystallized his thoughts in the Theory of Relativity, that matter and energy are equivalents, in his famous formula; E=mc2 ..
. which says that to calculate the energy, you multiply the mass by the square of the speed of light. Which is a lot!!! Matter turns out to be the very energy that was released with the Big Bang.
"Ah, we already know this for almost a hundred years now!" -Yes and you still don't see the consequences, do you?- * Considering that there is no intelligent force nor an eternal force in the entire universe, we have to assume a conscious and intelligent spirit behind this force. Since spirit as such cannot exist, we have to compellingly assume the existence of a spiritual being. Max Planck (discoverer of quantum physics)
Literal text in German;
Als Physiker, der sein
ganzes Leben der nüchternen Wissenschaft, der
Erforschung der Materie widmete, bin ich sicher
von dem Verdacht frei, für einen Schwarmgeist
gehalten zu werden. Und so sage ich nach meinen
Erforschungen des Atoms dieses:
Es gibt keine Materie an
sich.
Alle Materie entsteht und besteht nur durch eine Kraft, welche die Atomteilchen
in Schwingung bringt und sie zum winzigsten Sonnensystem des Alls zusammenhält.
Da es im ganzen Weltall aber weder eine intelligente Kraft noch eine ewige Kraft
gibt - es ist der Menschheit nicht gelungen, das heißersehnte Perpetuum mobile
zu erfinden - so
müssen wir hinter dieser Kraft einen bewußten intelligenten
Geist
annehmen. Dieser
Geist
ist der Urgrund aller Materie. Nicht die
sichtbare aber vergängliche Materie ist das Reale, Wahre, Wirkliche - denn die
Materie bestünde ohne den Geist überhaupt nicht - , sondern der
unsichtbare,
unsterbliche Geist
ist das Wahre! Da es aber Geist an sich ebenfalls nicht geben
kann, sondern jeder Geist einem Wesen zugehört, müssen wir zwingend Geistwesen
annehmen. Da aber auch Geistwesen nicht aus sich selber sein können, sondern
geschaffen werden müssen, so scheue ich mich nicht, diesen geheimnisvollen
Schöpfer ebenso zu benennen, wie ihn alle Kulturvölker der Erde früherer
Jahrtausende genannt haben:
Gott!
Damit kommt der Physiker, der sich mit der Materie zu befassen hat, vom Reiche
des Stoffes in das
Reich des Geistes.
Und damit ist unsere Aufgabe zu Ende, und wir müssen unser Forschen weitergeben
in die Hände der Philosophie."
Ref." Max Planck *
Sometimes a comparison is made between -vapor, water, ice- and -God, Holy Spirit and Son- , which is in fact a very good analogy, for it is God's infinite Spirit, His Creational energy, released at the Big Bang in our finite universe, that gradually dewed and froze into the material world that we live in and can be observed through telescopes. This Universe is His Creation; The creational Light inside it is His Son, and at the same time it is His own Spirit. It's like a hand arranging things in an aquarium; the fish can only see the hand but do not know who is attached to it. It is as if He is His own Son in His own Creation; in this womb we call Universe. The amount of Spirit released in our universe would in ancient times be called a god or an angel; an Archangel in charge of this Creation.
The Sumerians had an uppergod named Anu, or An. An, or Anu literally means Spirit; He was even called Holy An; Holy Spirit. the Spirit, the Willpower, the energy that was released with the Big Bang.
"An" (on) still is the Hebrew word for "power". It might be interesting to know that it also means "Son".
The oldest Sumerian creational myths state that Spirit and Matter; the gods An and Ki, were born as the unity Ki-An at the beginning of time in the primal waters of our dimension they called Nammu. She was the mother. The children were twins; they were alike, they were one and the same. The original Hermaphrodite. The Jewish Adam (Kadmon) and Eve. Nammu is the goddess of the Primal Waters, or, the Ocean of Potentiality, or "Abstract Potential Existence, Unified Field or Superstring Field" as modern scientists would say. Our dimension.
Matter and Spirit are the same; Matter is only a manifestation of energy; Everything you see is a manifestation of this Spirit.
MATTER-OF-SPIRIT.
The stuff dreams are made of; the stuff we are made of.
Spirit is another word for energy or power. Everything that is, exists because of this Spirit. This material world however is an illusion, but it is obvious, that we exist.
I think and therefore I exist. Descartes.
*
It is sometimes said, that "the most absurd part of religion is the part where EVERYTHING has to fit our modern belief structure". ...But if it actually does fit... WHY DENY IT?
If the material world is the illusion, it follows that the spiritual world must be the real world. Shouldn't we focus our attention then to this spiritual world? Shouldn't we focus our attention to our spiritual bodies? Shouldn't we focus our attention to our Soul, our spiritual body.
 Count the black Wavicles
Sitemap . . . . .
Is the Big Bang theory controversial with creational myths What's the relation between Atum Atom Atma and Adam Enjoy *
|
The comfortably solid "Newtonian" world view of the materialists has been entirely undermined by the new physics of the twentieth century, and in particular through Quantum Theory. Physicists investigating the properties of sub-atomic matter, found that the deterministic Newtonian absolutism broke down at the foundation level of matter. An element of probability had to be introduced into the physicists' calculations, and each sub-atomic event was in itself inherently unpredictable - one could only ascribe a probability to the outcome. The simple billiard ball model collapsed at the sub-atomic level. For if the billiard table was intended as a picture of a small region of space on the atomic scale and each ball was to be a particle (an electron, proton, or neutron, etc.), then physicists came to realize that this model could not represent reality on that level. For in Quantum theory one could not define the position and momentum of a particle both at the same moment. As soon as we establish the parameters of motion of a body its position is uncertain and can only be described mathematically as a wave of probability. Our billiard table dissolved into a fluid ever-moving undulating surface, with each ball at one moment focused to a point then at another dissolving and spreading itself out over an area of the space of the table. Trying to play billiards at this sub-atomic level was rather difficult. In the Quantum picture of the world, each individual event cannot be determined exactly, but has to be described by a wave of probability. There is a kind of polarity between the position and energy of any particle in which they cannot be simultaneously determined. This was not a failing of experimental method but a property of the kinds of mathematical structures that physicists have to use to describe this realm of the world. The famous equation of Quantum theory embodying Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle is Planck's constant = (uncertainty in energy) x (uncertainty in position)Thus if we try to fix the position of the particle (i.e. reduce the uncertainty in its position to a small factor) then as a consequence of this equation the uncertainty in the energy must increase to balance this, and therefore we cannot find a value for the energy of the particle simultaneous with fixing its position. Planck's constant being very small means that these factors only become dominant on the extremely small scale, that is within the realm of the atom. So we see that the Quantum picture of reality has at its foundation a non-deterministic view of the fundamental building blocks of matter. Of course, when dealing with large masses of particles these quantum indeterminacies effectively cancel each other out, and physicists can determine and predict the state of large systems. Obviously planets, suns, galaxies being composed of large numbers of particles do not exhibit any uncertainty in their position and energies, for when we look at such large aggregates as a totality, the total quantum uncertainties of the system reduces to zero, and in respect to their large scale properties can effectively be treated as deterministic systems. Thus on the large scale we can effectively apply a deterministic physics, but when we wish to look in detail at the properties of the sub-atomic realm, lying at the root and foundation of our world, we must enter a domain of quantum uncertainties and find the neat ordered picture dissolving into a sea of ever flowing forces that we cannot tie down or set into fixed patterns. www.levity.com/ It all sounds very uncertain if you ask me, as if you built a house on mud. It's the very foundation of Creation we're talking about here. The certainty of our world is presented as proof for a theory of uncertainties. Assuming that "quantum indeterminacies effectively cancel each other out", sounds a bit like assuming that marbles in a jar will stay in place even after breaking the jar with a hammer. The fact that particles do stay in place sooner proves that there is something else keeping them there, something very certain, and holding in mind that particles behave according to the expectations of the observer,(see below) this something unavoidably has to do with consciousness or willpower. But who could be "willing" to keep some distant galaxy together?
* Even the crushing of dying stars millions of miles in diameter into black holes within 15 seconds or so occurs faster than the speed of light. -Speed-of-light
experiments give baffling
result at Cern. - This isn’t an isolated anomaly, but has been going on for years. The team has now measured some 15,000 batches of neutrinos coming across that distance, and they say they’ve reached a point where the statistical significance is such that, were they trying to prove anything else, it would count as formal scientific discovery. But try as they might, they can’t explain what’s happening. popsci.com 09/22/2011 Particles traveling faster than time opens up the possibillity of time travel. If time travel is indeed possible it would give a good explanation for accurate prophecies that have been given in the past to prophets by angels that sometimes claimed to be messengers from the future. * The idea of another reality where everyone exists in a different scenario acting out alternative decisions is addressed in yet another many worlds interpretation of quantum physics. The interpretation is predicated upon one of the following principles being true; 1; Our very consciousness actually effects the behavior of subatomic particles. (See below) 2; Particles both move backwards and forwards in time and also appear in all possible places at the same instant. 3; In every single instant of the tiniest portion of a second the entire universe is splitting into billions of parallel universes.(?) 4; The universe is connected with almost instantaneous transferring of information. Capitalizing on one of these statements the many worlds interpretation conveys the idea of de-coherence where our world branches off at every different decision creating an infinite number of parallel worlds in which every possibility exists. So, in many worlds you could indeed be hundreds of years old, never even born, or the discoverer of quantum physics itself. But that would mean that each consciousness is creating its own (physical) universe; that you could in fact be the god of your own universe. Yet we're all connected are we? If we are, wouldn't it be a simpler thought that we are all living the same dream? That we are all part of a central consciousness that is creating this universe as we speak? That our souls are indeed sparks or better yet rays of spirit emanating from God, dividing Himself into billions of autonomous fragments equipped with consciousness and a free will, intentionally meant to experience and enjoy this world in all possible aspects. That this world could indeed be Paradise if we would only unite and put our minds to it. In all the Vedas it is said that the individual souls are like sparks (or rays)emanating from the blazing fire of God. This entire universe is pervaded by Me, the unmanifest Brahman. All beings depend on Me . I do not depend on them. Bhagavad-Gita 9.04 There is another eternal unmanifest state higher than Prakriti that does not perish when all beings perish. This unmanifest state is called the imperishable or Brahman. This is said to be the ultimate goal. Those who reach My Supreme abode do not return (or take rebirth). This Supreme abode, is attainable by unswerving devotion to Me within which all beings exist, and by which all this universe is pervaded. Bhagavad-Gita 8.20 The Supreme Spirit in the body is also called the witness, the guide, the supporter, the enjoyer, and the great Lord or Parama-atma. Bhagavad-Gita 13.22 The Lord abides in the heart of all beings, causing all beings to act by His power of Maya (Illusion) as if they are mounted on a machine. Bhagavad-Gita 18.61 * (Bhagavad-Gita 11; 15; Lord Brahman seated on the lotus. “Aum mani padme aum” means; aum, Jewel in the lotus, aum. The word "Om" represents the vibrating energy of the Spirit of God. Its letters stand for; A-Agni; fire, U-Waruna; water, and M-Maruts; air (ether). Quantum entanglement occurs when particles such as photons, electrons, molecules as large as "buckyballs", and even small diamonds interact physically and then become separated; the type of interaction is such that each resulting member of a pair is properly described by the same quantum mechanical description (state), which is indefinite in terms of important factors such as position, momentum, spin, polarization, etc. According to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, their shared state is indefinite until measured. Quantum entanglement is a form of quantum superposition. When a measurement is made and it causes one member of such a pair to take on a definite value (e.g., clockwise spin), the other member of this entangled pair will at any subsequent time be found to have taken the appropriately correlated value (e.g., counterclockwise spin). Thus, there is a correlation between the results of measurements performed on entangled pairs, and this correlation is observed even though the entangled pair may have been separated by arbitrarily large distances. This behavior is theoretically coherent and has been demonstrated experimentally, and it is accepted by the physics community. However there is some debate about a possible underlying mechanism that enables this correlation to occur even when the separation distance is large. Is there a faster than light pilot wave or guiding wave at work here, a hidden variable we don't yet know about? Or is this whole world with us included in fact quantum entangled with God?
Quantum Physics was developed in
the early twentieth century as the science of the smallest possible
things. The essential principles of quantum physics can be explained
with a simple experiment. When matter is projected through two
parallel slits, two bands of matter are collected on the other side.
Waves projected through those slits produces interference causing
multiple bands. However, when quantum matter such as tiny electrons are
projected through the slits, in stead of two bands there is
interference, thus many bands.
Could the electrons be interfering with
each other? It turns out when single electrons are fired one at a time
there is still interference. But how? Mathematically a single electron
breaks apart to go through both slits and rejoins on the other side.
However when a measuring device is used to observe the electron the
behavior resorts back to the collection of the two bands. It's as if the very nature of measuring or observing alters the behavior of the electrons. But how do the electrons know they are being observed? We know it has to do with the observer focusing his attention to them. Is the observer sending out rays from his eyes that are influencing the electrons? But a measuring device does not send out rays, it merely registers them. Do the electrons have a consciousness of their own or are they as well as the observer (and everything and everyone else for that matter) part of an all including super-consciousness that is creating this world according to the expectations of the ones in it? If so, we must all be one with this super-consciousness. Could this super-consciousness be the supreme Spirit the Bhagavad Gita is talking about or the unmanifest Brahman? (see above) Could it be God? I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness. Max Planck As quoted in The Observer (25 January 1931) The quantum theory has shown that, on a subatomic level, matter does not exist with any certainty but merely has a tendency to exist. Events are not linked to a certain time and place but merely show a tendency to happen. The quantum theory made clear why subatomic particles can also be waves. Not real three-dimensional waves like sound waves or ocean waves, but waves of probability. (see above) The quantum theory touches the fundamental unity of the universe and shows that we cannot divide the world into tiny independent units. Ravelling out matter we’ll find that nature is not a conglomerate of fundamental building blocks but an extremely complex web of relations between the different parts of the whole in which the observer plays a substantial role. On a subatomic level all processes and properties of a subject can only be understood in terms of interaction with the observer. In other words, nothing is what it seems and everyone experiences things differently (due to their own expectations). * Would you not say to yourself, "Some super-calculating intellect must have designed the properties of the carbon atom, otherwise the chance of my finding such an atom through the blind forces of nature would be utterly minuscule." Of course you would. A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question. ” Fred Hoyle(theory of stellar nucleosynthesis) *
The big question today is; WHAT DETERMINES MASS? What is Mass, because they used to think that matter was made up out of little parts of solid matter , called molecules. Later they found out that molecules consisted of even tinier bits they called atoms, after the Greek word "atomos" which means undividable. Today we know that the atom is not as undividable as they used to think. The Atom-bomb is based on atoms splitting up into particles releasing an enormous amount of energy. One of the greater scientific achievements of man. (or so they say)
It turned out that every single particle they found or invented didn't exist of matter at all but energy. So the universe wasn't as material as they used to think. But what then is mass? Mass is defined by the quantity of matter in something. A potato may weigh something on earth because it's made of matter but in outer space it doesn't weigh anything but it still is made of matter, it still has mass. If someone throws that potato at your head even in outer space and you don't duck you will feel the impact. But if all matter including this potato is only consisting of energy how comes it has any weight at all? All interactions/forces in nature (electromagnetism, weak, strong and gravity) are transmitted by particles called gauge bosons. For example electromagnetism is 'carried' by photons. This idea was carried on to explain mass. In 1966 Peter Higgs (University of Edinburgh) proposed that the universe was full of a field called a HIGGS FIELD. Disturbances in this field as particles move through it cause objects to have mass. From a quantum point of view, we can only stir up the field in discrete units. The smallest possible disturbance is due to a HIGGS PARTICLE, or more precisely, a Higgs Boson. The field consists of countless Higgs Bosons that act like a kind of cosmic molasses that fills all of space. As objects move through space they have to 'wade' through these Higgs particles that 'cling' to them, causing a drag that shows up as mass. The Higgs boson is often referred to as "the God particle" by the media, after the title of Leon Lederman's book, The God Particle: If the Universe Is the Answer, What Is the Question? Lederman said he gave it the nickname "The God Particle" because the particle is "so central to the state of physics today, so crucial to our understanding of the structure of matter, yet so elusive," but jokingly added that a second reason was because "the publisher wouldn't let us call it the Goddamn Particle, though that might be a more appropriate title, given its villainous nature and the expense it is causing."
*
Quantum physicists say that when you get down to the smallest thing that makes a thing that makes a thing that makes a thing, essentially the universe at its core is, that it's "unpredictable". The best thing they can come up with is that the universe at it's core is some sort of relationship of energy that we simply cannot control. It has a mind of its own. Some of them even use the word "personality" Rob Bell In the Hebrew language there is no word for spiritual. Everything we do we do 100% physical, 100% spiritual. What ever you do , do it in the name of Jesus. Every act is a spiritual act. Rob Bell * The heat death of the universe is a suggested ultimate fate of the universe, in which the universe has diminished to a state of no thermodynamic free energy and therefore can no longer sustain motion or life. Heat death does not imply any particular absolute temperature; it only requires that temperature differences or other process may no longer be exploited to perform work. In the language of physics, this is when the universe reaches the maximum entropy. Wikipedia (back) * It is a mistake to think that people in old days thought that the earth was a flat square on which the heaven rested on four pillars and it is a mistake to think that this is what the Bible is teaching. It is he who is seated over the arch of the earth. Isa 40:22 BBE
hanging the earth upon nothing. Job 26; 7 YLT People in those days practiced science, and knew a lot more than they are given credit for. * If one proceeds directly and straightforwardly in this matter, without being deflected by a fear of incurring the wrath of scientific opinion, one arrives at the conclusion that biomaterials with their amazing measure or order must be the outcome of intelligent design. No other possibility I have been able to think of... ” Fred Hoyle (theory of stellar nucleosynthesis) |
|||||||||
On www.ted.com Drew Berry is showing some truly amazing computer “Animations of unseeable biology” of the manufacturing of DNA micro tubules inside each single living cell of our body, completely freaking out hardcore atheist scientists. On molecular scale a DNA replication machine is making an exact copy of a DNA string while it has to reproduce one of the strands backwards by cutting it up repeatedly into little loops, turning these around and gluing them back together again. All inside a cell. Incredible! As the result of computer calculations you can see these insect-like molecular creatures in what can only be described as an assembly line of the tiniest molecular machines, literally walking one foot before the other and putting stuff in place with tiny little arms while weaving together micro tubules that are growing out of a chromosome inside a cell. Nano-technicians eat your heart out! As soon as their job is done they all at once move away to the next job or to the Bar or wherever they go. Berry insists that it is an accurate representation of what is going on in our bodies. If this isn't some kind of April's fools joke then God must have a great sense of humor creating something like this; "That'll freak'm out for sure!" Must see!
Judging by some comments however, it's all about temperatures and electromagnetic forces and vibrating "self arranging molecules" that are like magnets arranging themselves into long strings if you'd shook them about long enough in a box, providing us with a “very strong illusion of design”. Well I have some magnets in a box at home and they did cluster together once I shook them, but I am still waiting for them to crawl around in it and reproduce anything at all. And I have to tell you, I don't see that happening any time soon. Not even if you shook them for a Billion years or so.
One more intelligent comment went; "Just how complex does a system have to be to qualify for 'Designed' status? The complexity of the process that is revealed by this animation suggests to me a high intelligence. I don't necessarily attribute that intelligence to the molecules themselves, and it seems to me more likely that they share a super-consciousness. I wonder if an animated representation of what's happening at the sub-atomic scale would suggest greater intelligence still."
I'd have to agree with Meryl Steinberg who commented; “I enjoyed the slides and watched in awe of what I see as more evidence of an amazing intelligence that is constantly creating. Which, by the way I find totally compatible with the theories of evolution. Baffled why people argue about it. Both are true. The more science explores the more the mystery of an infinite unknowable consciousness becomes apparent. Have fun figuring it out. And about the ending poverty stuff? We can do that already. Sadly, those who hold the reigns of power, haven't evolved sufficiently to allow that to happen.
For more of those animations go to; http://www.molecularmovies.com/showcase/
.
|
The Fibonacci numbers are the numbers in the following integer sequence: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144 etc. By definition, the first two numbers in the Fibonacci sequence are 0 and 1, and each subsequent number is the sum of the previous two. Fibonacci sequences appear in biological settings, in two consecutive Fibonacci numbers, such as branching in trees, arrangement of leaves on a stem, the fruitlets of a pineapple, the flowering of artichoke, an uncurling fern and the arrangement of a pine cone.
 Fibonacci sequence in a flower heart. Fractals are being defined as "rough or fragmented geometric shapes that can endlessly be split into parts, each of which is (at least approximately) a reduced-size copy of the whole," a property called self-similarity. (!)
Before Mandelbrot coined the term Fractal, they had been regarded as isolated curiosities with unnatural and non-intuitive properties. Mandelbrot brought these objects together for the first time and turned them into essential tools for the long-stalled effort to extend the scope of science to non-smooth objects in the real world. He highlighted their common properties, such as self-similarity (linear, non-linear, or statistical), scale invariance, and a (usually) non-integer Hausdorff dimension. He also emphasized the use of fractals as realistic and useful models of many "rough" phenomena in the real world. It isn't as if Mandelbrot was looking for a way to imitate nature. He just stumbled upon how nature does it. Natural fractals include the shapes of mountains, coastlines and river basins; the structures of plants, blood vessels and lungs; the clustering of galaxies; and Brownian motion. Fractals are found in human pursuits, such as music, painting, architecture, and stock market prices.Fractals are some of the most interesting puzzles of mathematics. They are made by simple formulas, but when you let a computer loose on them, while on a diet of Fibonacci sequences, and add some color, the most intriguing natural shapes will appear on your screen.  The "Thumbprint of God", they are called. A great secret of the universe is revealed in many fractal images. |
|||
|
Computer rendered FRACTALS |
God given NATURE |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
||
|
EVERYTHING IS DESIGNED Our World is One Big Mathematical Wonder |
|||
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Earth Jesus Christ is Lord. Heaven
(in Chinese.)
For contact, comment or constructive criticism, please click above.
The content of this site is research and a work in progress and is not to be regarded as absolute truths.
With regards, J. Smits
Netherlands
Calgary Weddings Earthquake Kits
www.bugman123.com how to make fractals
